27/07/05 15:05 Filed by Saswat Pattanayak in:
Saswat | Editorial
By Saswat Pattanayak
Often times we are led to believe that
the extreme religious fanatics oppose the prevailing
administrations. The ruling governments condemn the
extreme rightists and call for restrain. And the
population is led to believe that the fanatical
barbaric causes are espoused by a small minority of
believers who have nothing to do with the political
parties they are in support of, however right-wing or
conservative they may be.
So the media often discuss in detail how former
Indian PM Vajpayee used to be a right man in a wrong
party, how the BJP (the right wing party) was in
principle opposed to the extremist right wing bodies
such as World Hindu Council, or RSS –even as the
latter were bases which gave birth to the former!
This brainwash goes to such an extent that people
genuinely start believing that Advani (the alleged
instigator of communal riots) now is being opposed by
the extreme right-wingers for being soft on Pakistan.
Nearer home, the Bush administration is being
criticized for being too liberal by the fellow right
wingers. KKK is not yet dead, but we all were told
that it was an organization of cowards who never got
any administrative support. We were told that KKK
were always critical of every government in power
too, absolving them of any collaboration. Or that
American Nazi Party has nothing to do with the
moderate right wing politics at the Center. Or that
McCarthy was an aberration, although communism was
evil.
But all throughout these apparent oppositions of
intra-right wing politics, what transpire are the
victories of the right-wing agendas. Then what is
portrayed is that with hesitations rife, things get
acted out. Like India had a nuclear test done of the
Hindu Bomb or America had an unfortunate war on Iraq.
The reality is that, the fanatical aims are
eventually fulfilled, albeit, amidst a more
sophisticated public projection.
Why does it seem that complicated and not this
simple? Are the religious fanatics really those
wayward minorities that are disliked by the ruling
elites? If that be the case, how is it that the
administration finds no problem in endorsing much of
the demands of the fanatics (on grounds of religious
freedom, preaching, commandments at court, the war
lobbies, propagating god’s words, incorporating
religious practice within health sector, allowing
religious parties to contest and lend supports,
making issues out of abortion and gay marriage, etc
&hellip

?
If Martin Scorcese's “The Last Temptation of Christ”
(1988) was so successfully picketed by the right
wingers across the country, a story to tell of it was
never devised. Only recently, Ken Tipton’ own story
was directed for
“The Heart of the
Beholder” (2005), a movie that has been dubbed as
“the movie Hollywood was afraid to make”.

In no uncertain terms the film
captures what no previously made English
language film had ever accomplished. The reality
of how a sense of freedom is always granted with
religious sanctions is well juxtaposed with
hesitations of the ruling elites to take up
responsibilities for the ruckus. Going beyond
that, the true story of Tipton’s reveal how the
same elites feigning ignorance and publicly
maintaining distance from religious bigots are
actually very much hand-in-gloves with the
latter! Still going beyond that, Tipton shows
how he and his family go ahead to take revenge
on the believers than sit tight, shit scared.
If there has been a film that tells the story in
Hollywood, this is the one to watch. Made
independently, this may not hit your theatres.
But if you
get read this story, do spread the word! One way
or the other, folks need to understand that the
religious fanatics have always ruled the world, after
devising a God as a justification of their rule and
install few political groups who mock-fight with each
other in a so-called democracy as their instrument of
rule. And we, as believers in Jesus not as a tempted
man or Buddha not as an avowed atheist, view the lens
as prescribed, according to the terms of fanatics, to
differ only in degree, not in types. And we assume
that the fanatics cannot be among us, within us, even
without questioning our own godly beliefs and levels
of intolerances!
Tags: Saswat, Film, Christianity, Atheism