So who do the largest democracies of the world
recognize? The power of the monarch, or the power of
the people?
Who do the India, USA, EU listen to? The Nepali
royal's roars, or the Nepali subjects' pleas?
Whose ways and manners the so-called civilized
approve of? The gun-trotting police hounds; the
abusers of basic human rights; the murderers of
hapless civilians; the killers of women, children,
the unemployed youth; the police dogs of a royal
murderer-aggressor; the oppressors of teeming unheard
millions?
Or
the marginalized voices long silenced; the women who
refuse to anymore tolerate; the children with the
non-violent weapon of protest; the organized
unemployed; the unduly browbeaten; the peoples who
remind the rest of the world that if not for
'advanced' world's stoic privileged indifference,
they would be also be enjoying lives of dignity.
More power to the Nepalese peoples for freedom,
liberty, and ‘real’ democracy—-none of which is ever
bestowed, nor negotiated, nor offered as a
compromise.
The white American freedom was not ‘granted’ through
negotiations with the Kings of England, the elite
French liberty was not attained via cowardly
compromise either, the bourgeois Indian democracy was
not gifted by well-meaning British—each of them were
snatched, and millions sacrificed their lives in
protest against the oppressors.
‘Tis time, the preachers of today realized the only options they have left the Nepalese (and so many indigenous peoples in India too) are sense of frustration, alienation and revolution.